South East GMTS Assurance Information Session Evaluation SE GMTS Assurance Information Session - Evaluation Survey What was the date of your training session? Optional Organisation Name Optional What is your role within GMTS? Programme Manager Optional Placement Manager Optional GMTS Lead Optional Other Optional If you selected Other, please specify: Optional How was the pre-event communication? Excellent Optional Very Good Optional Satisfactory Optional Less than satisfactory Optional Poor Optional What improvements to communication could be made? OptionalPlease rate the quality and/or accuracy of the joining instructions Excellent Optional Very Good Optional Satisfactory Optional Less than satisfactory Optional Poor Optional How easy was it to access/attend the session? Extremely Easy Optional Very Easy Optional Neither easy nor difficult Optional Difficult Optional Very Difficult Optional Optional If it was hard to access, please explain how this might have been improved OptionalHow satisfied overall were you with the content of the assurance information session? Very satisfied Optional Moderately satisfied Optional Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Optional Slightly dissatisfied Optional Dissatisfied Optional If you were not satisfied, what improvements could be made? OptionalHow effective was the session at outlining the structure of the GMTS scheme for organisations? Extremely effective Optional Very effective Optional Moderately effective Optional Slightly effective Optional Not effective at all Optional If it was not effective, what improvements could be made? OptionalHow effective was the session at outlining the application and assurance process for organisations applying to host a GMTS trainee? Extremely effective Optional Very effective Optional Moderately effective Optional Slightly effective Optional Not effective at all Optional If it was not effective, what improvements could be made? OptionalHow useful do you feel the session was in outlining what makes a strong placement for GMTS trainees? Extremely useful Optional Very useful Optional Mostly useful Optional Moderately useful Optional Not useful at all Optional If it was not useful, what improvements could be made? OptionalHow would you rate the quality of facilitation? Excellent Optional Very Good Optional Satisfactory Optional Needs improving Optional Poor Optional What might have improved the facilitation event? OptionalWas the content presented at the right pace? Completely Optional Mostly Optional Partly Optional Not at all Optional Was the content pitched at the right level? Completely Optional Mostly Optional Partly Optional Not at all Optional The quality of programme materials (i.e. slides, handouts, pre-read) was: Excellent Optional Very Good Optional Satisfactory Optional Needs improving Optional Poor Optional What topic areas did you find most useful during the training (select all that apply) Recruitment Process Optional Placement Structure Optional Competencies Optional Trainee education Optional Features of a strong placement Optional Trainee context and challenges Optional Roles and responsibilities within GMTS Optional Information on finance Optional Statement of Commitment Optional Quality Assurance process Optional Placement information Optional Timeline of process Optional Other Optional If you selected Other, please specify: Optional What topic areas would you have liked more information? Recruitment Process Optional Placement Structure Optional Competencies Optional Trainee education Optional Features of a strong placement Optional Trainee context and challenges Optional Roles and responsibilities within GMTS Optional Information on finance Optional Statement of Commitment Optional Quality Assurance process Optional Placement information Optional Timeline of process Optional Other Optional If you selected Other, please specify: Optional Are there any other ways you feel these sessions could be improved? Optional